If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
sorry but wouldn't agree i think it would be alot better without the t-shrt and a different belt just doesn't suit the shirt and trousers thing i think</P>
i really dont agree with ok today il wear poell or today il wear raf simons, im sorry but just buying into a designer head to toe is easy and uncreative i have to admit i have done it before but not on purpose and i hate doing it, i have noticed a few peopl inparticular'' doing it on here, and if thats your thing then fair enough but im not preeching as if im the best dressed here but just a thought, anyone else's opinions</P>
[quote user="wire.artist"]I do like the pic, as Buckwheat pointed it's much better to see the clothes in a context. [B]
[/quote]</P>
yeh i agree but i dont think the pic takes anything away from the clothes the clothes are still the main focus in shot, i was out with a mate photographing the place anold factory we discovered so just took the photo where i was there and then</P>
I've never understand that double belt. I've tried it on myself and have seen it worn by a lot of people but I can't remember one time where I thought it looked good. It seems to be a primeexample of Poell's eurotrash DNA (as Fuuma would call it) coming to the forefront.
ouch, burn on the doublebelt. i own it and i really like it. i don't think it looks particularly eurotrash, but it's not as practical or versatile as other belts. i love it because it's quirky and makes people look at it differently. all my co-workers always ask, are you wearing 2 belts?
[quote user="deleuze"]I've never understand that double belt. I've tried it on myself and have seen it worn by a lot of people but I can't remember one time where I thought it looked good. It seems to be a primeexample of Poell's eurotrash DNA (as Fuuma would call it) coming to the forefront.[/quote]</p>
Looks wonderful on me. I'd take it in a flash.</p>
Snafu, what makes you think xadam is buying into a brand, instead of deciding that the things that look great together happened to be all by Poell?</p>
Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with wearing all or predominantly the same brand, just depends on whether it looks good or not. with respect snafu, that's not a hugely creative outfit you have on, whether or not it's all the same brand.
i love the harsher, more antagonistic new sz. after taking the pic, i debated for a while about posting it, i thought it was too boring in its ccp-business-casual vibe, but i wanted to show off the boots.
</p>
buying into a brand: generally, i think this term applies to someone who buys the current season of a designer because it's en vogue and then dumps it the next season for whatever's trendy that season. not applicable here, as ccp is a lifestyle.</p>
for those who want to see my chest hair: flattered, but this isn't van nuys, and i'm not a 70's porn star.
</p>
i would agree about poell being an exception for instantce i think his suits looks great with his boots and shoes where as they would clearly not work with a classic dior suit or something more traditional </P>
my comment about the brand was not about that fit in particular its more just an idea i agree with, and with a suit its diffent because its more of a trational dress sence you cant layer as easy with suit you are restricted to shirt/top and shoes and then tie, then you can wear something over the suit </P>
anyway back on track i agree my out fit is plain and very basic not exactly the most creative but rember i was climing about an old factory and the aesthetic is getting more mainstream by the day </P>
Comment