HOF process
This is what I wanted to suggest, to make things easy and avoid the too many dedicated HOF threads (HOF nominations, HOF Jury, HOF itself, etc) and to push forward the principle of democratic decision :
1°) nominations should be made here, in the WAYWT.
2°) then, people would have one week to vote.
But will only be taken into consideration motivated votes (i.e. with explanations).
One thing can be discussed : to have, or not, an aristocratic balance of the democratic vote (in memory of the HOF jury), vote of a member over 1000 posts could equal two, or three (or fifty ) regular votes.
This is what I wanted to suggest, to make things easy and avoid the too many dedicated HOF threads (HOF nominations, HOF Jury, HOF itself, etc) and to push forward the principle of democratic decision :
1°) nominations should be made here, in the WAYWT.
2°) then, people would have one week to vote.
But will only be taken into consideration motivated votes (i.e. with explanations).
One thing can be discussed : to have, or not, an aristocratic balance of the democratic vote (in memory of the HOF jury), vote of a member over 1000 posts could equal two, or three (or fifty ) regular votes.
Comment